It was an od begger ( whom) Mary met in the street yesterday.这是一个强调句的结构吧,可是有人理解为是 an od begger 的定语从句,
来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/06/19 01:38:47
![It was an od begger ( whom) Mary met in the street yesterday.这是一个强调句的结构吧,可是有人理解为是 an od begger 的定语从句,](/uploads/image/z/8457457-49-7.jpg?t=It+was+an+od+begger+%28+whom%29+Mary+met+in+the+street+yesterday.%E8%BF%99%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%AA%E5%BC%BA%E8%B0%83%E5%8F%A5%E7%9A%84%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E5%90%A7%2C%E5%8F%AF%E6%98%AF%E6%9C%89%E4%BA%BA%E7%90%86%E8%A7%A3%E4%B8%BA%E6%98%AF+an+od+begger+%E7%9A%84%E5%AE%9A%E8%AF%AD%E4%BB%8E%E5%8F%A5%2C)
It was an od begger ( whom) Mary met in the street yesterday.这是一个强调句的结构吧,可是有人理解为是 an od begger 的定语从句,
It was an od begger ( whom) Mary met in the street yesterday.
这是一个强调句的结构吧,可是有人理解为是 an od begger 的定语从句,
It was an od begger ( whom) Mary met in the street yesterday.这是一个强调句的结构吧,可是有人理解为是 an od begger 的定语从句,
孤立地看,一般视为强调结构句
如果有语境,有时可以把( whom) Mary met in the street yesterday看成是“定语从句”
例如:
A:Someone is knocking at the door.Who can it be?
B:It was an od begger ( whom) Mary met in the street yesterday.
right
这句话不是强调句。强调句和定语从句的区别在于去掉was和who这句话是否还通顺。如比较:
①It is a question that needs carefulconsideration.
②It is novels that Miss Williams enjoys reading.
第一句就是定语从句,第二句是强调句。第一句若去掉that,句子就不成句了。再说强调句不...
全部展开
这句话不是强调句。强调句和定语从句的区别在于去掉was和who这句话是否还通顺。如比较:
①It is a question that needs carefulconsideration.
②It is novels that Miss Williams enjoys reading.
第一句就是定语从句,第二句是强调句。第一句若去掉that,句子就不成句了。再说强调句不用用whom
收起
你好。不对,因为这是一个不完整的强调句。完整的应该是(比如说):
It was an old beggar ( WHOM) Mary met in the street yesterday THAT told her the funny story.
( WHOM) Mary met in the street yesterday --------定语从句部...
全部展开
你好。不对,因为这是一个不完整的强调句。完整的应该是(比如说):
It was an old beggar ( WHOM) Mary met in the street yesterday THAT told her the funny story.
( WHOM) Mary met in the street yesterday --------定语从句部分
THAT told her the funny story.--------强调句的後半部分
收起
这个是强调句。It is/was。。。that/who ”强调句型,判定方法是 把It is/was。。。that/who 这部分去掉,看句子是否成立。 an od begger Mary met in the street yesterday. 并不缺成分。不是定语从句。